Presentation

Research term paper assessment criteria

Completeness of information – 2 points

• Student is aware of all the essential information on the topic - -100%
• Student is aware of the sufficient part of the essential information on the topic -75%
• Student is aware of the sufficient part of the essential information on the topic - 50%
• Information on the topic presented by the student is scarce - 25%
• Student is not aware of the essential information on the topic - 0%
  
  

Logic of reasoning – 1 point

·         Reasoning is maximally consistent and logical - 100%

·         Most part of reasoning is consistent and logical - 75%

• The logic and consistency of reasoning is fragmentally violated - 50%
• The logic and consistency of reasoning is mostly violated - 25%
• Reasoning is inconsistent and illogical - 0%

Justification of conclusion – 1 point

• Conclusions are convincingly presented and arguments are maximally well-grounded - 100%
• Conclusions are generally justified, but in some cases arguments are not grounded enough - 75%
• Conclusions are more or less justified, although sometimes arguments lack plausibility - 50%
• Conclusions are superficially justified and arguments are not plausible - 25%
• Conclusions are not justified - 0%
  
  

Structure – 1 point

• The structure of the research term paper is fully compatible with the set task, the text is well organized, sections emerge in consistent and logical succession, introduction, main body and conclusion are clearly outlined– 100%
• The structure of the research term paper is compatible with the set task, the text is organized, however, succession and logic of sections lack clear outline - 75%
• The structure of the research term paper is partially compatible with the set task, the text is more or less organized, in some cases succession of sections is violated, introduction, main body and conclusion are not properly outlined- 50%
• The structure of the research term paper is less compatible with the set task, the text is  not organized, the logic of the text is violated, introduction, main body and conclusion are not outlined - 25%
• The structure of the research term paper is not compatible with the set task - 0%

Compliance of academic writing (APA) with style -1 point

• Standards of academic writing (APA) (header, citation rule, bibliography rule) are fully reserved -100%
• One of the standards of academic writing (APA) (header, citation rule, bibliography rule) is not reserved - 75%
• Any two of the standards of academic writing (APA) (header, citation rule, bibliography rule) are not reserved - 50%
• Two essential standards of academic writing (APA) (header, citation rule, bibliography rule) are not reserved - 25%
• Standards of academic writing (APA) (header, citation rule, bibliography rule) are not  reserved – 0%

Presentation Assessment Criteria:

The content of the presentation- 2 points

• The content of the presentation is clear, laconic and well organized; Focuses are correctly highlighted; Dominant issues are clearly outlined and the organic connection  among them is reserved - 100%
• The content of the presentation is clear, laconic and organized; In most cases focuses are correctly highlighted; Essential part of dominant issues is clearly outlined and the organic connection  among them is mainly reserved - 75%;
• The content of the presentation is not clear and correctly organized; Focuses are correctly highlighted; Essential part of dominant issues is not clearly outlined and the organic connection  among them is ambiguous - 50%;
• The content of the presentation is not specific and correctly organized; Focuses are absolutely incorrect; Dominant issues are not outlined - 25%;
• The content of the presentation does not comply with the topic- 0%
  
  
  

Presentation skill – 2 points

• Feedback with the audience is complete; Speech is organized; The idea is clearly structured; Visualization is effective and adequate; Time limit is observed- 100%
• Feedback with the audience is sometimes violated, though speech is organized; The idea is clearly structured; Visualization is effective and adequate; Time limit is not violated - 75 %
• Feedback with the audience is violated; speech is organized, though the idea is not clearly structured; Visualization is adequate, though less effective; Time limit is not violated - 50 %
• Feedback with the audience is violated; speech is not organized; The idea is ambiguous; Visualization is adequate and not effective; Time limit is violated - 25 %
• There is no feedback with the au